Assessing Our Coaching

I’m not a football coach, but here is the recipe for football success:

  • Nobody is called “coach” by players
  • No tackling at practice
  • No sprints at practice
  • No playbooks

…no kidding.

These are the actual rules of the winningest coach in NCAA football history. They are the rules that underpin the 489-38-11 record of John Gagliardi, former head coach of Division III Saint John’s University of Minnesota.

The soft-spoken winner keeps a hard-bound copy of his own book, Everything I Know About Coaching, on his office desk. Every page in the book is blank. Despite this humility, Gagliardi’s coaching wisdom presents some of the most difficult questions I have encountered in my coaching career.

When I speak with other coaches, we often challenge each other to identify why we coach. It’s a tough and worthwhile question. But the legacy of John Gagliardi has prompted me to start myself asking a question that’s more tricky: Why do I coach how I coach?

Sure, I care about the students I coach. I think every coach whom I admire truly does. I work hard to adopt and display a servant model of leadership that places the needs and concerns of my players at the forefront of my decision making. I study and teach others the value of nurturing, caring, positive coaching. I honestly believe that my job is the development of the entire student and that winning is one small non-primary goal in the context of that job.

But Gagliardi’s example poses a different, less comfortable challenge: Could coach in a manner that rejects nearly all of the “coach” archetype embedded in our collective sports psyche? Can I survive if my players (and their parents) don’t see enough of the collective Bryant-Wooden-Knight-Hoosiers image of coaching? Would I still be credible? Would I ever win again? Would I keep a coaching job? When I start to ask these questions, I question whether I have the courage or the craftsmanship to move my habits in this direction.

There is probably no single effective voice or tone for coaching. We each adopt and adapt the model that we find effective to reach our coaching goals. We make choices.

Increasingly, though, I’ve questioned how much I really do choose my coaching voice. Perhaps I simply mimic fragments of the voices of the coaches I’ve seen and worked with. The question emanates from the fact that I’ve rarely seen a coach (particularly in contact sports such as basketball, football, or hockey) with as divergent a model as John Gagliardi – despite the fact I am blessed to see, work with, and talk to literally hundreds of very, very talented coaches every year.

Concurrent with this growing realization, I’ve started to listen to and to hear my coaching tone of voice and that of the coaches around me. I veer so effortlessly from teaching to demanding to correcting – and the tone of my voice becomes increasingly more harsh and self-serving along that continuum. What has struck me is that I often speak with a tone I don’t use or hear anywhere else. I don’t hear myself speak to colleagues, friends, family, or classroom students with the same acidity of tone. Why?

Again, I can only blame the voice of the archetypal coach. I blame my own need to show coaching success primarily through winning and by appearing to be the coach players and parents have learned to expect. And in this, I realize that as my tone degrades, I am becoming increasingly focused on my own needs, worries, and frustrations rather than those of my players. I worry that my approach to doing my job  – my real coaching job of developing whole students – is tainted by hypocrisy.

For me, there are a number of take-aways from this. There is room for a coaching voice and approach that is vastly different from what we’ve come to accept as the norm. It is worth listening to how we talk to student-athletes as coaches and asking whether we would ever use our coaching tone in other circumstances.

Can I coach differently, questioning every habit I have honed over a career? Can I at least move in that direction? If I ask my athletes to continually grow and improve – even when it’s difficult and glacially slow – can I hold myself to the same standard?

The most affecting facet of John Gagliardi’s example, though, is its unapologetic selflessness. He exhibited a genuine belief that the game and the team truly belong to the players. He coached in a way that gave that team and that experience back to the players in its purest form, unsullied by his own ego or needs. He worked from the premise that their growth and dignity surpassed all other goals – even winning. And in doing so, he won. His record proves the amount of his winning, but tells nothing of its remarkable quality.

Team Building

The following is from Bob Williams, Head Boys Basketball Coach, Niles West High School:

Some say that teamwork is the key to every success.  Success in sports, in business, and in life is directly dependent on effective teamwork.  Recent trends have made the concept of team building desirable to those who manage people in our culture.  One cannot function in today’s global society without participating on countless teams, and the process of building an effective team has become one of the ‘hot’ topics in the business world today.  This concept, though, is not something new in the world of sports.  Coaches have developed and managed effective teams throughout the history of organized athletics.  Coaches who are successful in an athletic environment are successful in the most competitive atmosphere available for building teams.  Therefore, it is reasonable to analyze the methods of successful athletic coaches to identify effective team-building techniques.  This paper addresses the process of building a successful team in athletics.  The strategies presented have proven successful in various athletic environments; however, this process can be easily adjusted to be effective for building teams in any setting that requires teamwork.

The first step in building any team is choosing the team members.  This process can vary greatly from situation to situation, depending on the pool of talent available for the team.  A coach or business manager should look at various factors when choosing the members of the team.  Talent is a major part of the successful team, but should not be the most important aspect to consider when choosing a team member.  The most important factor to consider is the character of the player.  A team cannot be effective if the leaders on the team are lacking in character.  A highly effective team may have a player or two with questionable character, but these players cannot be team leaders.  Only when the leaders of a team have character will the team itself have character.  Team character is crucial for achieving success.  Character gives teams the winning edge and lifts the team to its goals.  It must be established in the culture of the team that character matters.

Equally important when choosing a team is how the abilities of the players complement each other.  The coach needs to ask himself whether he would like a collection of amazing players or an amazing collection of players.  A collection of amazing players will disappoint unless their talents are complementary.  Frequently, teams achieve championship status when they don’t necessarily possess the greatest individual talents, but are victorious by blending their abilities in a way that makes the whole greater than the sum of its parts.  It is out of the ordinary, though, for a team to achieve greatness without this precious quality.  A coach who has selected players with great character and complementary skills will have laid the groundwork for a team which attains the elusive state of synergy, where the skills and abilities of the team combine in the most powerful way possible.

The next task is to assess the various reasons why the players want to be on the team.  There are commonly many different reasons for participation among the team members.  The most common reasons are typically associated with fulfilling personal needs that can range from receiving recognition to personal accomplishment, from belonging to competing, from having fun to developing discipline.  Each player will have his own reason for being on the team.  It is the coach’s responsibility to insure that the players understand that the best way to achieve their individual goals is to work as an effective team member.  Frequently, a coach cannot completely change the character of all of the people trying out for the team.  Furthermore, a coach usually cannot have power over the reasons the players try out for the team.  This is not to say that the coach will be a victim when attempting to build an effective team.  The better the character and motivations of the team members, the easier the job is for the coach.  A team lacking in these areas makes the job more difficult for a coach, but, either way, the job can be done.

Regardless of the composition of the team, it is imperative that the coach convinces the players that they are all attempting to accomplish the same thing – a mastermind alliance.  A mastermind alliance occurs when all team members are so committed to the team vision that they seem to function as a single mind.  Pat Riley refers to it as “The Core Covenant”.  Phil Jackson calls it “Zen Selfless Awareness” or “Five-man Tai Chi”.  Jackson also quotes Rudyard Kipling’s poem from The Second Jungle Book as an illustration of this point:

Now this is the Law of the Jungle-

As old and as true as the sky:

And the Wolf that shall keep it may prosper,

But the Wolf that shall break it must die.

As the creeper that girdles the tree trunk,

The Law runneth forward and back.

For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf,

And the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.

Whatever term a coach may use, compelling a team to pursue the team vision is the single most important task a successful coach must accomplish.  Once the team is persuaded of the desirability of the team vision and the opportunity presented by this vision, every other task is considerably easier.  A coach needs to address the vision every day in every activity.  The vision needs to be worthwhile in the minds of the players.  The vision does not necessarily have to be what others would deem to be positive or advisable.  There are numerous examples of leaders like Hitler or Jim Jones who were highly effective at convincing a team of the attractiveness of some very negative goals.  A coach who picks a positive vision and influences his team to work to achieve this vision has accomplished the most difficult task in team building.

A wise coach never assumes that the task of selling the vision to the players is done.  He works each day to deepen the understanding and belief that his players have in the vision.  This undertaking could be called “positive brainwashing”.  Many of the techniques that comprise the process of brainwashing are techniques that effective coaches have used for years.  The effective coach knows that it is important to talk to his players about the vision when they are under duress in practice.  The effective coach knows that it is important to talk to his players at the end of practice when they are tired.  The effective coach knows that it is important to talk to his players before and after games when they are very emotional.  The effective coach knows that it is important to be redundant about important topics.  These are all techniques that are shared with the process of brainwashing.

The key for a successful coach is to thoroughly examine the team vision and his own motivations for this vision.  If the fundamental motivation is to develop effective team members who will become useful members of society, then this process can be called positive brainwashing.  If the fundamental motivation is something less than this, then the vision can easily be twisted into a harmful situation with a predictably negative outcome for all.

True belief in the team’s vision is essential for the core members of the team.  This will create positive leadership and a positive team culture.  Then, even if there are members of the team who don’t quite have the true belief, all team members will still feel compelled to work to achieve the team vision.  Not doing so would violate the norms of the team.  A player who violates these norms can be easily identified.  When this happens, the player must be forced to decide whether he wants to work to achieve the vision with the rest of the team or decide that he no longer wishes to be part of the team.  The biggest mistake a coach can make is to be seduced by the talent of a player who does not believe in the team vision.  Regardless of talent, a player who does not work to achieve the team vision cannot be allowed to remain on the team.  Every effort should be made to convince this player of the merits of the vision, but when push comes to shove, the player has to be given a choice – work with the rest of the team to accomplish the team vision or be removed from the team.

The coach must also develop leadership on the team from among the team members.  If the coach is the only legitimate leader on the team, the values and commitment of the team tend to be very superficial.  The leaders on the team can accomplish a great deal when the team is away from the coach.  If the leaders are promoting the team vision when they are away from the coach, the team will realize that this is not something they are doing for the coach, but something they are doing for themselves.  The easiest way to develop leadership on the team is to find important non-critical issues and let the team decide how to resolve such issues.  The more often the coach does this, the better.  It is essential that these issues are important to the team, or this activity will be meaningless and weaken the leadership of the team.  When a coach defers important decisions to the team often, he can gauge the level of understanding that the team and the team leadership have of the vision.  If that level is very high, the coach can then let the team address critical issues as well.  The coach can have confidence that the team will do the right thing because they have demonstrated an understanding of the implications of the team vision.  If the level of understanding is not as high, then the coach knows the team will need more guidance in decision-making.  Also, the coach knows that he must be more diligent in his efforts to convince the team of the merits of the team vision.  The delegation of decision-making responsibility to team members is a proven way to develop effective team leaders.

A coach must also set the values for the team.  This, again, is done on a daily basis.  A common negative occurrence on a team is that the players learn to value talent.  Talent is important, but it cannot be one of the team’s core values.  Talent is relatively fixed on a team.  One can develop talent to a point, but most physical or mental attributes cannot be changed considerably and those that can usually are changed over a long period of time.  The same can be said for skills.  A basketball player who has a poor jump shot cannot learn to be a great three-point shooter overnight.  It takes time.  If a team has a core value of talent, then they become victims of that talent.  They either have it or they don’t.  If they don’t, they might as well go home.  If they do, they will tend to rely on their talent and not improve much in the process.  This team will lose when facing a team with equal or greater talent.  This team will also lose to lesser talented teams that have worked to improve throughout the year.  Achieving and developing more talent is important, but it is not a positive team value.  The key question then becomes “What should a team value?”

Effort needs to be at the core of the team’s value system.  When a team member makes great effort, it needs to be recognized and rewarded by the team.  Each team member will bring different talent levels to the team, but every team member can make great effort.  This value puts all team members at the same level.  Regardless of the relative status of the team member, it must be important to give great effort.  The coach must give great effort.  The most talented must give great effort.  The least talented must give great effort.  Each and every member of the team can and should be accountable for their effort.  The most talented players are going to accomplish more and, as a result, outsiders will be likely to recognize them more for their labors.  The team members must always be conscious of the core value and recognize those players who are making great effort regardless of the outcome of that effort.  There are many other values that need to be important to the team, most of which revolve around character issues.  These need to be wisely chosen and encouraged, but the value that has to be emphasized on a daily basis is the value of making effort.

Most teams have some type of a hierarchical system that determines the duties and relative importance of each team member.  Obviously, this creates an atmosphere of competition among the team members. These circumstances can inspire each team member to give great effort each day.  They can also lead to bitterness and a sense of discord among the team members.  To avoid this, the leader of the team must communicate very concisely the roles on the team and the process used to choose the personnel for each of these roles.  This process must be well known to all members of the team.  The leader must communicate that the ability to make others around you perform better is an essential characteristic for those wishing to fill the most desirable roles on the team.  A team member who has this characteristic must be put in a position of relative importance.  When a team member behaves in a way that helps others perform better, it must be recognized and rewarded by the team leader.  This will not only underscore the importance of this ability, it will also help to define what behaviors actually help others to improve their performance.  Some common behaviors that should be rewarded are showing enthusiasm, encouraging others, mentoring, and showing a sense of humor in discouraging situations.  This is a partial list that is contingent upon the personality of the team, but it is important to recognize and clearly state which behaviors truly lead to better team performance.  A wise coach will work tirelessly with his best players to develop these abilities.  When the organizational culture dictates that the best players excel in this quality, the teams in this organization will consistently achieve at high levels.

The coach and the leaders of the team must impart a sense of duty and responsibility to all members of the team.  Players need to feel that their performance is important to team performance.  They need to believe that by not being properly prepared or by not giving adequate effort, they are letting their teammates down.  Each member must feel that his performance is essential to the total team effort.  Many times a leader can best communicate this by pointing out a seemingly insignificant effort and showing the invaluable effects of this effort in the big picture.  A prime example of this effect occurred recently in a Schaumburg High School basketball game.  In the middle of the first quarter the opposing team scored a three-point basket to make the score 7-6 in their favor.  A Schaumburg player immediately ran the floor full speed and scored an easy lay-up before the other team could react to regain the lead for the home team.  Schaumburg subsequently went on a 17-0 run and handily won the game.  Looking at the video closely, it was clear that the easy basket frustrated and discouraged the visiting team.  They had just gained the lead and ‘boom’, it was gone.  Some players put their heads down, while others were yelling at their teammates.  This single effort had changed the course of the entire game.  The impressive part of this play is that the Schaumburg player ran the floor in this way every time, and had no guarantee that it would make any difference on this particular possession.  He chose to make this effort because he knew it was the right thing to do for his team, and his teammates were counting on him to make great effort.  The leaders of the Schaumburg team recognized and celebrated this effort even though it was expected from each team member.  This reinforcement serves to insure that the player will continue to make great effort and other players will consider improving their effort.

On the flip side of this coin, members of the team must trust each other enough that when a team member is not performing, they can freely tell the team member to improve his performance.  All team members must agree that this criticism will not be personal, but it can and should be pointed.  Every effort should be made to keep the goal of improving the team in mind when a situation occurs with team members.  A team member can forcefully correct a teammate without demeaning the player as a person.  This allows all team members to share in the responsibility for the performance of the team.  The team leader can best facilitate this in two ways.  First, the leader should have a team meeting for the express purpose of compelling all team members to agree to this concept – one can correct an individual for the betterment of the team as long as it is not personal.  Secondly, the team leader needs to model this behavior during team performance.  He can do this by intensely correcting the behavior of a team member during a performance without changing the way he treats the person after the performance.  This shows the team that the leader cares deeply about team performance, but that a poor performance does not affect the way that the leader feels about the individual.  Role modeling in this way will encourage others to react appropriately when the performance of a team member is not acceptable.

Also, a coach needs to adopt a non-judgmental attitude towards the players.  He must encourage them relentlessly.  He must hold them accountable to the team for their effort and performance.  He must remove them from the team if they choose not to conform to the team culture.  But he must not be judgmental about the decisions a player makes concerning the team.  A coach’s job is to convince the players of the desirability of striving for the team vision.  If a coach fails to do this with a player, he must direct his efforts toward the players who are still on the team.  A coach who spends time making unkind remarks about a player who quits the team is wasting time and is conveying an extremely negative message.  The message a judgmental coach gives to his team is that a person is valuable only if he does what the coach desires.  It will not be long before the players begin to understand that the coach is simply using the players to fulfill personal goals.  The non-judgmental coach sends the message that each player is important as an individual, but the coach has chosen to make team performance more important than any individual.

When new members become a part of the team, it is important that they are integrated into the culture of the team in a timely manner.  It is important that the coach and the leaders of the team realize that the socialization process will take some time.  It is also important that the new members of the team realize that they have much to learn.  The standards set for the new members will not be as stringent as the standards for experienced team members.  It is imperative, though, that the new members understand that they must have a sense of urgency to develop into fully functioning team members.  This is the quickest way to return the performance of the team to optimal levels after a change in team personnel has occurred.

Building a successful team requires persistence and determination.  First, one must choose a team considering the character and motivation of the prospective players as well as their talent.  Then, the leader must work diligently to convince all team members to energetically pursue the team vision or remove themselves from the team.  Leaders must be developed from within the team through a team decision-making process.  A core value of exceptional effort must be instilled in all team members beginning with the most talented players.  The team leader needs to clearly communicate the respective roles of the team members and reward those players who make their teammates better.  The leader must inspire a sense of responsibility among the team members to make great effort for their teammates and to recognize this effort when it occurs.  The leader must also foster a sense of trust on the team so that each player can honestly and openly critique another player’s performance.  The leader must always encourage team members to work towards the team vision without being judgmental.

A coach or team leader who determinedly works with his team using these strategies is destined for success.  It is said that teamwork is the key to success in life.  The most noble of endeavors in life then is to build a successful team.  The team leader who remembers this through the difficult progression of team development will surely move successfully towards the ultimate accomplishment – being the architect of a great team!

Practice Thoughts and Behaviors

1. ATTITUDE: Never have a bad practice.

2. COMPETITION: Compete in practice at game speed! Teaches fundamentals and the value of competing.

3. BREAK BAD HABITS: In pre-season work on making yourself more of a complete player.

4. CONCENTRATION WHEN COMING OFF THE FLOOR TO PRACTICE:
a. Run two easy laps
b. Stretch
c. Shooting drills on your own
– In close/one hand
– No more than three men at a basket
– Each player has a ball
– Can pass to shooting drill
– Shoot from where you shoot from in the game

5. RUN BALLS TO THE RACK AND CRICLE UP: Theme for each practice and for each week

6. SPRINT BETWEEN DRILLS

7. FROM THE TIME WE ENTER THE COURT WE’RE ALL BUSINESS

8. SHIRTS MUST BE TUCKED IN: For games and practice/look good

9. DRILLS WILL BE COMPETITIVE: Winners and losers
Winner – Drink or shoot free-throws
Loser – Punishment with a ball
a. Run-Catch-Pass and shoot Lay-Up (if missed, go again)
b. Sprint Back on D – Simulate
Denial Steal – Run lane and shoot lay-in

10. REVOLVE AROUND TEAM CONCEPTS
a. Pass – Thank him
b. Charge – Other four pick him up
c. Man leaves game – Bench gets up and greets him
d. Time out – sprint to the bench

11. STATIONS: Muscle memory to emphasize important details of our teaching

12. MAIN CONCEPT OF PRACTICE: Pressure of game in practice so we must practice hard!

13. KEY: CONCENTRATION AND TOUGHNESS EVERY PRACTICE
Consistently concentrate – play hard and play smart

Questions About Practice

The following is from Jim Harrington, former Head Boys Basketball Coach, Elgin High School (IL):

1. Is stretching part of your practice time or do you expect your athletes to do it before practice starts?

2. Do you follow last year’s practice plan or do you write new ones each day?

3. Do you put a time limit on each activity or do you stay with the activity until it is performed to your satisfaction?

4. Do you let the players see the practice plan or do you keep it from them?

5. Do you vary the length of practice during the year or do you always use the time allotted to you?

6. Do you work on offense and defense during the same practice or do you concentrate on them on separate days?

7. Do you practice special situations every day or do you save it for the day before a game?

8. Do you always play your 1st team together or do you mix your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd teams?

9. Are you tougher on them after a pitiful loss or an exhilarating victory?

10. What percent of practice is drills; what percent is scrimmage?

11. How do you end practice?

12. When do you give a day off?

13. What days do you go harder than others?

14. What part of practice (beginning, middle, end) do you place your most demanding drills?

15. When do you put in new plays and what part of practice is it done (beginning, middle, end)?

Overtraining

The following is from Larry Dean Jackson and Coach-Jackson.com:

Overtraining is a serious concern for all athletes and coaches because of the recovery time required for over-use injuries. To avoid a situation that leaves a player out for most of the season, coaches should watch for these signs of overtraining:
• Early-onset fatigue
• Severely decreased motivation
• Complaints of chronic, but bearable, pain
• Decreased technique as a means of compensation for pain

Adequate recovery time is one of the easiest ways for coaches to protect their athletes from overtraining.

Players should not work on every skill at every practice.

This means that some days, different muscle groups will not be used, or will be used only secondarily. If players work every major muscle group at every practice, they will never have enough time to completely recover from previous workouts, which will force them to start practice in an already weakened state.

There is no hard-and-fast rule about the right amount of recovery time, but if players work one muscle group intensely during a practice, they should have two days of recovery time. During this recovery time, they should stretch and do other light movements to keep the muscles from seizing up or becoming painfully sore.

Monitoring athletes also allows coaches to recognize optimal times for training. The beginning of the season is an optimal time for training because there are fewer games and more need for specialized instruction and team-building work. As competitions pick up in the middle of the season, intense training should wind down, allowing players to focus more on running drills and mastering complex game patterns instead of conditioning or hard training.

As the season winds down, coaches can increase the level of training if they feel that their team is not already overworked. For some teams, the intensity of the competition will be too much, and increasing a training program would cause them to be over-trained.

Pay close attention to your team and their needs to create a program that keeps everyone safe and healthy.

Coach the Thrills

The following is from Larry Dean Jackson and Coach-Jackson.com:

Coach to the Thrills by Jim Murphy

Think about the things that excite you the most during a game you are coaching. Why are they so exciting? It is because they are momentum changers and things that win games.

I think you could plan every practice by writing down the 5 to 7 things that give you the biggest adrenaline rush during games and planning every practice accordingly. You would be emphasizing all the things that make the game great. Here are some of the things that would be on my list.

1. Getting a big stop at the end of the game.
2. Perfect execution of an offensive play for an easy successful shot.
3. Having all the inside positions for a defensive rebound
4. Taking a charge!!!
5. A great pass for an easy shot.
6. An inside out pass for an easy (made) 3.
7. Breaking a press for a layup.

I think that if everything we do in practice is planned to make me jump (relative term now) out of my seat during games, we will get better and better.

Fundamentals are the Foundation of Great Players

When I talk to average players they often talk about how they find it boring to work on skills and work on the fundamentals of the game. However, when I talk to the best players they often talk about the importance of spending time on their skills and the detail of their skills. Fundamentals may not be fun to work on, but they are what often times separate the best from the average.

So how do “the best” work on these fundamentals and what do they work on? Below is a list that all players should consider.

1. Shooting: must make sure you are taking “game shots; from game sports; at game speed.” Each player should put a great deal of thought to the type of shots they get out of the system they play in. Every player should know where their shots will come from (based on the position they play) and how they arrive in those spots. What shots do they get where they cut into that shot? What shots do they get where they usually dribble into those shots? What shots do they get where they have to cut into the shot? These are the questions that must be answered as they put thought to what they will be working on. The other question that must be answered is: what angles do you come into those shots? So you much get “catch-shoot shots”; shots off the dribble; and shots off the cut.

Once you arrive at these answers you then have to add two other components to your shooting workouts. 1) You must work on “form shooting”; the proper technique on every shot you take. 2) You must work on shots where a defender is contesting that shot. The form shooting is so you get your technique down correctly; we don’t get into having players take 500 shots; or 300 shots; or 1,000 shots. We want them taking as many shots as they need to take to insure that they improve, but what is more important than the total is that they take “1 perfect form shot 500 times”; not just take 500 shots! And the reason we want players to have a defender contest the shot is that most shots in the game have a defender near the shooter; flying out at the shooter; or actually up and contesting the shooter. We want our shooters to develop a confidence where that will never bother them.

2. Dribbling: First and foremost is that players need to master the basic dribbles (speed, cross over, fake cross over, through the legs, hesitation) and the players need to work on being able to dribble with pressure on them as well as dribble through any contact. This is the dribbling equivalent of game shots from game spots at game speed. Being able to dribble, keep your head up, and get through contact are all important to incorporate into your workouts. The final part of this is to make sure the player puts a heavy emphasis on the development of their weak hand.

3. Conditioning: conditioning is so important because it is the basis for all improvement. In order to improve you must practice effectively. In order to practice effectively you must be in great condition. The best players will practice at game speed and for long periods of time. The only way to accomplish this is by being in shape. When all is said and done conditioning is the foundation for improvement.

4. Footwork: footwork, if done properly, can save time and inches, which, in turn, makes you quicker. There will be different footwork required based on the action. It is important to think the footwork through before you work on it and then execute the footwork a little slower if it is the first time you will use it. As you get more comfortable with your footwork then you speed up. Get it right before you make it fast!

5. Defense: this is a tough area to work on when you are putting together a personal skill development program for yourself. Staying in shape is an important part of defense so you must pay attention to the conditioning aspect of your program. It never hurts to actually work on your slides; but most important is to make sure you concentrate on defending whenever you are in a pick up game. Make it a personal habit to really get down in a stance and defend in these settings.

This will give a “how to” on putting together your skill development program. The more important part of it all is not so much the “how to,” but the “how often.” The great players will put in consistent work until they master a skill. Then they keep working on it so that they maintain that skill. So the key becomes the players’ own attitude toward the fundamentals. The average players get bored; the best players work hard and get better!

Credit: Unknown

Is Your System Part of Your Basketball Culture?

The following is from Nick LoGalbo, Head Boys’ Basketball Coach, Lane Tech High School (Chicago):

Is the system of basketball X’s and O’s that you implement a part of the culture you create for your program? This is a question that I have personally been struggling with since I began envisioning the culture I wanted to create as a head coach. The question is a tough one to address no matter what level you are coaching, however, I think it is the most difficult for high school coaches to answer, specifically because a high school coach does not have the ability to recruit players to fit his or her system as a collegiate coach or a professional coach does. This is a question that I have asked coaches at clinics, in chalk talks, and at camps that I have worked. The vast majority of the coaches I have spoken to reply yes, the system you implement should align with the culture you create as they both are a part of your philosophy. For example, Coach Jim Boone at Delta State University is a pack-line defense/motion offense guy, and he believes that his system aligns with the culture of toughness he is creating. The culture he has created revolves around the team mantra: “grit and grind”.

Now don’t get me wrong, all coaches want to create a culture of toughness…all coaches want their teams to be able to dig deep and grind to improve, but there are varying degrees of toughness and also varying definitions. Further, and here is the key, the system you employ affects what that toughness means. For Coach Boone, toughness means “outlasting” his opponent defensively and having the discipline offensively to continue to probe the defense until his motion offense creates a breakdown. For Coach Don Showalter of the USA 16U team, toughness means understanding and executing the seven levels of his trapping system and utilizing the correct techniques in his side pick and roll offense.

Now, if you are going to be a coach preaching “grit and grind” as your team mantra, you are a team that is going to have to grit and grind everyday of practice. You will have to do those aggressive “toughness” drills everyday. There are some very successful and disciplined teams that do not have that “gritty” culture, yet they manage just the same. As a coach, I think we have to be aware of what we believe in and what we stand for. Then, we have to know what we will tolerate. To use the old cliché, there are a million ways to skin this cat, however, as the head coach of the program, your vision, culture, and system must align.

Taking it a step further, if you are a motion offense team like Coach Boone, the amount that you are going to trust your team offensively is at a much higher level than a coach that runs all sets. Not saying that one way is better than the other, but the degree to which you trust your team is also indicative of the culture you are creating, and, as just mentioned, the system you run reflects how much you trust your team.

With all of this being said, does this mean that you cannot change your system and keep your culture if the personnel dictates it? Of course not, the reality is that you culture is steeped in the values you hold as a coach. If a system change is necessary, the culture still works, but the values need to be re-aligned and calibrated.

For example, with our culture and our system we have had to re-shape our mantras and core values to align our shift in our system. One of our mantras is “Fear your comfort zone”. Our core values (seven total) included words like competitiveness, communication, and character. Last season we were a pressing team as we had four athletic guards that are all playing college basketball next season. We used their speed and quickness and were able to get into the open floor and ran a continuity pick and roll offense as they were all high-level ball handlers and decision makers. Now, after graduating those four players, we are transitioning into being a more half- court oriented team. Does that mean that those mantras and core values go out the window? No, we just re-define them. Last season when we spoke about “fearing your comfort zone” we spoke about endurance levels (obviously, we still need to be in great basketball shape so this applies), we spoke about focusing on knowing all of the calls out of our pressing system (we still need to keep our focus at a very high-level, now in learning the new defensive rotations in our half-court system). The core values of competitiveness, communication, and character clearly still apply as well. I think we will be an even more competitive team as we will not be as up and down so we are going to have to grind more and win those battles in the half court. Something that we will definitely have to tweak as well, is that we always preach outworking our opponents, and that has been defined as being aggressive (maybe overly aggressive at times) and getting up the line and denying. We will not be in that same deny position this season and are shifting that mentality completely. However, we are not going to stop preaching “outworking” our opponents, it will just mean outworking them in other ways.

The closing point here is that yes, changing systems could and should happen. Adaptability is a growing requirement in the coaching landscape, just ask Coach K. However, that doesn’t mean your culture should change. It should evolve and be tailored to your system.